It can't think, or form opinions. It's not "intelligent" in any real sense.
It's just Eliza with a really, *really* big array of canned responses to interpolate between.
> It can't think, or form opinions. It's not "intelligent" in any real sense.
Honest question, what is the purpose of this comment? What is the change you want to see coming out of this semantic argument?
The argument is that the output is racially discriminatory for a variety of reasons and it's easier to just say "it's racist" than "Many of the datasets that AI is trained on under- or over-represent many ethnic groups" and then dive into the details there.
So, just like people, then.
In fairness, with the ubiquity of cameras, sketches are much less required...
Imagine that a police officer is looking for someone matching the image but doesn't know that it's hallucinated from a vague description, they could let the real suspect go or incorrectly arrest someone who happens to look like the AI generated image but otherwise doesn't have any reason to be a suspect.
Police are already greatly overestimating the accuracy of their own facial recognition tools because they don't realize the limits of the technology, and this would just be worse.
That's not a necessary property of AI image generation. You could just add a 'output as a sketch' system prompt.
