I'm not surprised that a haphazardly organized group of people /can/ run a site like rarbg. It's just interesting how volatile (this isn't the right word but I'm not sure what is) the operations of these sites tend to be in light of the fact that the sites hold a lot of cultural value. RARBG was incredibly popular and was an important resource for torrenting. It's rare to see sites of that size and importance run in that way these days.

I guess he meant what he wrote: that the site was immensely useful, with just a handful of people behind it.

In this case, the reason is that being it in a sensible position, they must have chosen to close rather than to involve more staff.

CyberDDDDDD takin people to TASK! |DDD