If you google FSD fail compilation, you'll get a FSD fail compilation. You can do the same for humans.
Please continue this line of thought -
When I see a human fail video, where that person is an idiot, or drunk I conclude they shouldn't be driving. And usually their legal right to drive is taken away.
When I see FSD driving like a drunk idiot, I also conclude FSD shouldn't be driving. And their right to drive shouls also be taken away.
Lets treat them the same.
There's so much bias at every step of the process of looking up youtube videos that it lends essentially no credibility to any claim in any direction on this matter
Now if FSD proponents want to stop people from having doubts, they need to run several experiments in very diverse settings (as diverse as real world driving). In the absence of sufficient evidence, a skeptic is completely justified.
AP/EAP will run red lights and can't merge lanes on a freeway. FSD will stop for lights/stop signs, but that's about it. FSD Beta is what Tesla is typically known for and what many YouTube videos are showing. FSD Beta will stop at red lights and merge into freeways. Most people use FSD interchangeably, but they are not the same thing.
Your examples are bad. People do both of those things all the time.
survivorship_bias_airplane.jpg
Access to most of the latest versions of FSD were doled out on the basis of privilege. What do you think happened to people who post negative "reviews"?
If you kill the R&D goose or smother it in overregulation, more people will die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRdUjrOnKdw
and human drivers do not set an infinitely high bar.
Genuine question: what evidence is there of this?
I have big doubts regarding this claim. I could not find any source that is not Tesla.
Given that TFA is about Tesla deceiving and hiding information from customers, do you have any source that isn't Tesla or Musk?
