It's great in many ways, and free-to-cheap which is a particularly nice quality in a textbook, but it is _quite_ out of date at this point: it's tied to the old "ARM Compiler v5" bespoke compiler rather than the "v6" LLVM-derived one, and even Keil doesn't ship with v5 anymore. v5 used a different assembly syntax (v6 is GNU style, being LLVM derived - fortunately the toolchain can still ingest v5 style assembly _files_ just not inline so we can keep the assembly the students interact with matching the book), different tooling for C/Assembly interop, and an assemblage of bespoke macros and extensions, so there has been some creative tooling work to keep the book and assignments consistent for the students.
The EK-TM4C123GXL TivaC board that is the less expensive of the two targets the Valvano materials are built around is a pretty nice if slightly expensive embedded trainer, about $20-25 for a Cortex M4F with a fairly rich assortment of peripherals, a 2nd micro configured as a programmer/in system debugger on one end of the board, easy-to-interface male AND female headers on a bunch of broken out pins, pads to tap the USB-Serial traffic while it still looks like serial, high and low speed oscillators arbitrated by a pretty fancy clock circuit, two user buttons, and an RGB LED. Powerful enough and with enough Flash and RAM to get interesting things done, not so powerful or memory rich that you can get away with modern programming decadence, and simple enough that we can talk about the nuts and bolts of any particular feature.
We construct from "Baby's first assembly program" through "Register-direct manipulation" and finally "Controlling external devices via the HAL functions" over the course of a semester. Because of the way the degree programs are structured, we're a little more focused on "This is how computers actually work" than on embedded applications, but I'm still pretty proud of the course and the students mostly seem to appreciate it.
Not in Europe. Since FAANG level jobs aren't that numerous here compared to US so the difference between embedded and non-embedded work is close to zero. Pay is pretty similar.
Add sure, but if your only target in life is working for FAANG & Co. then every other tech job in the world pays very little.
You might as well also not want to be a doctor, teacher, lawyer, as well because hey, FAANG pays better. Everyone should abandon their passions and career dreams and become devs for FAANGs because pay is everything that matters in a career.
It's mostly a question of finding a company where the embedded software isn't an afterthought.
As opposed to the absolute perfection that is modern web, enterprise and mobile SW?
>But it's all fine as it shaves a few cents from the BOM.
Every engineering job, including SW development, works to reduce material costs and automate away other jobs. Why do you feel embedded development is somehow worse here?
Completely incomparable to web, enterprise and mobile (android and co is a part of the embedded trashfire of course). They all have their problems but are minor league compared to embedded development hell.
Embedded development takes BoM reduction to the extreme and piles all the technical debt onto software.
and a simple number is a very easy bludgeon to wield in discussions about engineering choices
