Not really ? Film acting is a delicate art. And it’s 1000x faster than computer animation. You can film a cheap film in 3 weeks maybe, on a tight schedule. The actors will be able to deliver what you need.

Animating the equivalent film would cost you something between 1-3 years.

So no I don’t see a way that any of this will affect film actors. We already have fully functional digi doubles, they just don’t use NERFs.

Pointing a camera at something / someone interesting is still somewhere around 1000x more efficient than computer animation. I don’t see a near or mid future where this changes.