The tigray war is kind of paused right now and Eritrea has not signed onto the ceasefire, so I would still treat it as a war zone if I were to travel there.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict could reignite if Azerbaijan wants to take advantage of Russia's distraction.

The Yemeni and Syrian civil wars are still not resolved

Western Sahara has a sort of no-mans land and a land mine problem and had clashes in 2020.

India's borders with Pakistan see skirmishes from time to time. A similar situation may arise with India and China too as water and geopolitical issues mount.

>"Oh yeah, which one?"

I mean, when has there ever not been several regional wars going?

> At least in March 2023 it was "slightly better" that people would go straight to assuming the answer is "Ukraine".

Ignorants perhaps. Several other active conflicts predate Ukraine's war[0]. It's just that nobody cared much, maybe as the people dying weren't white?

Wanna have fun? Pair the Wikipedia link about armed conflicts with the stats about the major arms exporters[1].

.0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflict...

.1: https://www.statista.com/statistics/267131/market-share-of-t...

Don’t forget the not often talked about Colombian Conflict!

> Depressing world facts in April 2023:

Has there ever been a point in at least the last 2500 years where there weren't multiple active warzones in the world?

> Yeah I don’t think it’s common knowledge in the west that our governments are doing the color revolution dance in Sudan.

But Wagner (a Russian PMC) is arming the RSF which are the ones trying to overthrow the current government.

So I fail to see how your assertion holds any water.

Nothing about the Sudan fight between two warlords (the president and the vice president) has any of the hallmarks of color revolutions or of western-backed popular uprisings. There is no evidence of western military intervention, apart from hasty and late withdrawals of embassy staff. [edit: Which rather illustrate that the US and Europe had no clue that war was about to break out]. There is, moreover, no stated ideology or cause behind either side - which is a giveaway that it's simply a local power struggle.

To argue CIA backing must exist in a case where it seems manifestly ridiculous weakens the (already tenuous) argument that the actual color revolutions required some form of western prompting.