An often overlooked innovation of iTunes was delayed billing, which converted multiple separate song transactions into one bundled transaction to save on credit card transaction fees.
Uber and Lyft do it now. It ought to be illegal, or opt-in (with a discount to the customer). Delayed billing wreaks havoc on the majority of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck
For debit cards, imagine your account has $0.01 in it and about to be overdrawn. Each transaction from here on out will net you a $35 overdraft fee.
Accounting for the fees, would you rather have 5 immediate charges of $1, or 1 delayed charge for $5?
For credit cards, there's no overdraft, just a hard cutoff.
That's not the same as putting $100 on a hotel gift card which you can use anywhere anytime at the hotels many properties, maybe to cover a pet fee or cleaning fee or parking, or to reduce the cost of a room during a peak cost period like 4th of july.
There's almost always a consequence for not providing value, and if 45% is unclaimed, that's not valuable to anyone but you.
I'd also wonder why so little goes claimed. I'd be worried about my product or service if people didn't want it, even if it was gifted to them.
Starbucks are more difficult, though. I sometimes have trouble giving them away, then they get lost or accidentally thrown away. I bet Starbucks has made more money off me from that than from me purchasing their products.
I can't put my finger on it, but as someone who has wholeheartedly embraced a "cashless society" vision, I feel better about gifting people with gift cards instead of cash. I don't know if it's any safer to send them through the mail, but it seems customary to tuck one into a greeting card, so that's how I treat my relatives on special days. I often keep a gas station card on hand, because I don't drive, and it can be real useful to offer a fill-up to someone who gives me a much-needed ride.
Suggest learning how to drive if you can. Being dependent on others isn't great.
> Gift cards purchased in Alberta are not subject to expiry dates and fees that lower their value over time. This includes cards purchased in Alberta on the internet.
The typical offenders for expiration dates and/or fees are bank-issued gift cards that run via a credit card network. Does the Alberta regulation cover those?
They also get another $1B of deposits from people loading money onto their app to pay for drinks. Starbucks is basically sitting on the equivalent of a small banks deposits at any given time.
This is why gift cards / loyalty balances are just crazy to me.
For a little convenience, you turn money into feudal coinage that only ever goes down in value: you see no interest, no adjustment for inflation. $100 on a gift card today is $97 (and probably less!) a year from now, ignoring completely the benefit the financial upside to the company for it.
Now I'm all worked up …
"We do not charge any activation, service, dormancy or inactivity fees in connection with your Starbucks Card. Your Starbucks Card has no expiration date nor does the value on your Starbucks Card ever expire."
I got this card 3 years ago and I have not used it yet, because I found that there is nothing really in that store that is worth below £100 that would compel me to go there or order online and items that interest me but are far more expensive, even considering the voucher I could buy cheaper elsewhere or even find such item used in as new condition.
So while I appreciate such gift, probably if someone scribbled £100 on a piece of paper it would have the same effect to me, but they wouldn't have to spend any money.