If I wanted to know the answer to that question, I'd first search some precomputed rainbow tables to see if anybody's gotten lucky:
Which is basically the same thing the GP says.
That being said, MD5 is no longer considered cryptographically secure due to vulnerabilities discovered over the years, such as hash collisions. But finding a specific hash, like the one you mentioned, would still require a brute-force attack or an advanced cryptanalytic method, neither of which is guaranteed to succeed.
Imagine a simple algorithm that should hash a string to a number 0-3, but due to an extra condition it actually cannot produce "3", pseudocode:
``` Sum = sumOfAsciiCodeOfString(input); Rest = Sum % 4; Return Rest === 3 ? 2 : Rest; ```
Or due to a bug (replace `% 4` with `% 3`).
Can we prove that md5 doesn't suffer from such issues and it actually can output ffffffffffff or deaddeaddeaddead ?