That being said, MD5 is no longer considered cryptographically secure due to vulnerabilities discovered over the years, such as hash collisions. But finding a specific hash, like the one you mentioned, would still require a brute-force attack or an advanced cryptanalytic method, neither of which is guaranteed to succeed.
If I wanted to know the answer to that question, I'd first search some precomputed rainbow tables to see if anybody's gotten lucky:
Which is basically the same thing the GP says.
Imagine a simple algorithm that should hash a string to a number 0-3, but due to an extra condition it actually cannot produce "3", pseudocode:
``` Sum = sumOfAsciiCodeOfString(input); Rest = Sum % 4; Return Rest === 3 ? 2 : Rest; ```
Or due to a bug (replace `% 4` with `% 3`).
Can we prove that md5 doesn't suffer from such issues and it actually can output ffffffffffff or deaddeaddeaddead ?