I get what you want but that's NOT HOW LAW WORKS or should work.
You don't get to declare something is bad first without reasoning your way through it through a tested system like law. That's more or less anti Constitutional / American etc.
For example, suppose a drug cartel invents a new formula. The DEA gets to ban it under existing law.
I'm not saying that's analogous. I'm merely providing a counterexample for your idea that the government always has to create custom laws whenever something new happens.
> For example, suppose a drug cartel invents a new formula. The DEA gets to ban it under existing law.
The cartels exist in the first place specifically because the DEA exists and keeps knee-jerk banning things without bothering to demonstrate actual harm.
