Now arguably those were international flights into the US. You could argue that security was lax abroad but generally TSA regulations and technical requirements apply to security screenings for inbound flights so there’s not any particular reason to believe that the TSA would have done a better job.
When travelling to the US we get subjected to random/targeted searches in the gating area by US TSA staff before being allowed to board.
This is after our own typical screening and scanning.
The second biggest thing that stopped them since 9/11 is passenger awareness that they could just... Not let a few assholes with boxcutters fly a plane into a building.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings#20...
- before 9/11, the advice was: sit down in your seat and wait for the ransom demands
- after 9/11: fight for your life now or die in a blaze of fire
Hijackers must feel this too. No quarter will be given.Personally, I'd expect the decrease to be mostly attributable to increased cockpit access security like locked reinforced doors.
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-breaches-...
> Shortly after reaching cruise altitude and while the captain was out of the cockpit, Lubitz locked the cockpit door and initiated a controlled descent that continued until the aircraft hit a mountainside.
Passengers figure out it's not a hijacking they might survive, and that you're going to crash the plane into a valuable target. Then, having nothing to lose, they revolt and ruin your plan.
So that particular type of plan isn't going to work again. Passengers no longer assume "hijacking I might survive".
Though it was the airline's own additional airport security check rather than the security checkpoint.
But questions like “why aren’t more people sacrificing their lives to hijack or destroy airplanes for the last 20 years” are not answerable by “sources”.
Do you have some reason to think a different posture towards hijackers and better security around cockpits didn’t have a strong effect on would-be hijackers’ willingness to give their lives to a violent political statement?