undefined | Better HN

0 pointsphilosopher12343y ago0 comments

i think he means trump, and i think it would've been strategically wise to give trump special treatment (tho probably not ideal)

0 comments

db48x3y ago

Actually, my first thought was the previous owner, or perhaps Twitter itself. But I left the question open, since it doesn’t matter who.

mynameisvlad3y ago

Considering I had to look up who the Twitter CEO even was before Musk, I’m going to say that no, they didn’t do the same thing to themselves.

db48x3y ago

Your memory of who the previous CEO was is not evidence one way or the other.

mynameisvlad3y ago

You would think someone forcing themselves up to the top of a feed designed to catch your attention would be a little bit more memorable than “I had to look up what he was even called”. You didn’t even know what his title was, ffs.

I’m sure your simping for Elon is highly appreciated. Maybe he’ll let you taste his boots next.

1 more reply

KyeRussell3y ago

No. Not a chance. Elon’s claims of mismanagement at Twitter have merit, though not nearly as much as he think, but the one thing that’s undeniable is that the previous “owner” (well, the CEO), is an adult that didn’t care about this shit.

dudeinjapan3y ago

Isn't it a problem if the CEO of Twitter doesn't care about his/her tweets, and the general public doesn't care either?

threeseed3y ago

The CEO of Twitter should be doing more important things than tweeting.

And far more important things than worrying whether said tweets are popular or not.

2 more replies

mynameisvlad3y ago

Why, exactly, should the CEO of Twitter care about their own tweets getting maximum attention? If anything, this takes engineering effort away from customers because special implementations like "is_elon" have to be added.

1 more reply

tlholaday3y ago

No, it isn’t a problem if the a CEO of Twitter doesn’t care about their tweets. The proper task of any CEO is maintaining the company as an immortal entity.

If the general public cares about the CEO’s tweets, then necessarily there will be a danger that the death of the CEO will ignite a crisis in the general public; e.g. Steve Jobs at Apple.

The producer is not the star.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

db48x3y ago

Actually, my first thought was the previous owner, or perhaps Twitter itself. But I left the question open, since it doesn’t matter who.

mynameisvlad3y ago

Considering I had to look up who the Twitter CEO even was before Musk, I’m going to say that no, they didn’t do the same thing to themselves.

db48x3y ago

Your memory of who the previous CEO was is not evidence one way or the other.

mynameisvlad3y ago

I’m sure your simping for Elon is highly appreciated. Maybe he’ll let you taste his boots next.

1 more reply

KyeRussell3y ago

dudeinjapan3y ago

Isn't it a problem if the CEO of Twitter doesn't care about his/her tweets, and the general public doesn't care either?

threeseed3y ago

The CEO of Twitter should be doing more important things than tweeting.

And far more important things than worrying whether said tweets are popular or not.

2 more replies

mynameisvlad3y ago

1 more reply

tlholaday3y ago

No, it isn’t a problem if the a CEO of Twitter doesn’t care about their tweets. The proper task of any CEO is maintaining the company as an immortal entity.

If the general public cares about the CEO’s tweets, then necessarily there will be a danger that the death of the CEO will ignite a crisis in the general public; e.g. Steve Jobs at Apple.

The producer is not the star.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse