> Alignment is impossible for AGI.

I mean that was my original premise supported by my article I posted. I go into detail on the conceptual methods for alignment and their fallacies.

When I state necessary, I don't imply the feasibility, it was in response to the question of the paradox.

Finally, the fact that AGI can not be aligned is also based on assumptions of its capabilities as well. If those capabilities don't manifest as we expect, that is really the only escape for the paradox.

AGI doesn’t mean super intelligent human brain. It just means a network capable of general intelligence (e.g. learning to solve new problems without having to be architected and trained for a specific data set.)