I ask because it seems like these are shifting in real time. The internet as an entity certainly contains more knowledge for any human, but it is plainly an aggregator so it doesn't seem right to say "it" is smarter. On the other hand, ChatGPT is an individual entity that is obviously more knowledgeable than any human. It gets things wrong all the time, and can't do everything humans can do (yet), but if you knew a human as creative and broadly knowledgable, you'd probably call them above average intelligence at least (aka smarter than the average human).
What are the goal posts we can agree on and why doesn't ChatGPT already qualify as "smarter than humans"?
