The following article analyzes the F15EX buy that is being debated as compared to the F35.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/buying-just-80-f-15exs...
Modern air combat can't be measured in direct comparison like this, or even thought of in terms of "we should be using X instead of Y"
The F-35 costs are also going down relative to it's peer group as the export market has grown significantly. The F-35s issue is that it's misunderstood, not that it doesn't meet expectations.
Of course, by now the networked operations are in use by other aircraft too, just F-16 and F/A-18 operate at the very tip of the multi-role.
Whether the networked use could remain operational in a conflict against technologically advanced enemy (with saturated ECM and comparably aggressive AA systems) is not yet proven. Also with addition of drones, the whole air-dominance becomes a tough objective to attain.
In the horrifying event of a US-China war or similar they'd be front line units along with F-35s and other modern fighters, but as is they'll probably end up on service life extension and retired without ever being used much in combat.
The F-15 was sold to other nations and IIRC the majority of its air superiority engagements were with the Israeli air force.
The F-22 is foremost an air superiority fighter and was intended to replace all the air superiority F-15s (but not the F-15E Strike Eagles.) However the USAF didn't get enough F-22s so they still have air superiority F-15s and will for some years to come.
Also the f15 has speed or range, and if you need one it reduces the other.