undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnotch898a3y ago0 comments

Give her a great deal to make her spill every last detail on camera after rejoicing her sentence will be tiny. Then pass all the details and recordings to the Bahamas and let them extradite her back to fox hill prison to rot for decades. That's what I'd do. "The deal was with the DoJ.... not the Bahamas!!!"

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

californical3y ago· 2 in thread

The whole reason that you can make deals is because the other party believes you’ll hold up your bargain. Is it really worth giving up the ability of the DoJ to make all future deals, just to punish someone even more heavily one time?

notch898aOP3y ago

If doing it once means they gave up the ability, that's already done. DoJ did this exact thing to Paul Le Roux. Got him to admit to murders in exchange for immunity. Now he's subject to extradition to the countries they happened in. His next stop is the Philippines.

The DoJ doesn't typically claim as far as I know that they will stop prosecution in other countries.

lesuorac3y ago

You mean in 2045 the USG might extradite him [1]?

I wouldn't call ~20 years into the _future_ "already done". But definitely think long and hard about any agreements you sign in an adversarial situation.

TBH, the guys not even an American so I don't think he really has a right to stay in the country after his sentence is over.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Le_Roux#Trial_of_Le_Roux

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse