Look into the history of drum machines. When they arrived in the late 70s, they sounded terribly mechanical. In the next couple of decades, small amounts of variation were added to make them sound more natural, the way many photographers today are adding artificial artifacts to photos that have been cleaned up too much by cameras' semi-automated post-processing algorithms.

But how sterile will art become? Already most people become inured to mass synthesthesia, where pureed sterilized Disney-fied content is fast becoming the unavoidable norm in so much of our media (e.g. pop and country music). Today's AI yay-sayers are receptive to a synthetically generated window onto the world are looking only at the first step in what will surely be a progression -- from a highly variable world of human-wrought artifacts to a homogeneous digitally simplified model of the world, one that will evolve into something ever more 'palatable', until... what? Is that a trend you would welcome?

Not I. Especially with Microsoft and Google and other gigacorporations calling all the shots in the absence of informed enforced guardrails to constrain how this rapidly evolves.