Obviously your comment is somewhat tongue and cheek, but your claim that a benchmark for human pride ("I needn't be proud of passing that exam") is no longer relevant because a machine can do it - or maybe a better way to say it was, "This computer proved what I already assumed"
It's so interesting to see it happen in real time
No, it just indicates that it was the one whose subject matter was best covered by GPT-3.5’s training data.
Cause there was only one correct answer for every question: "97% of scientists agree ..."
[/sarcasm]