> Anywhere you need text written, it can generate something. > Rather than asking it a question, feed it some bullet points and watch it convert it into paragraphs.

Part of me is hopeful that this will have the effect of people recognizing that maybe a) The text didn't need to be written after all, or b) The bullet point you started out with, were enough after all.

There is too much content being produced out of a notion of "something has to be here" for layout reasons, or because its simply what somebody expects.

Probably, ubiquitous use of generative text model will worsen the signal-to-noise ratio we see in media today.

Funny though, I actually know people who are still using crypto for various things. So you're kind of snarky remark about how I might not find ChatGPT useful also applies to people who use crypto too.

Like I said I do use the GPT...when I see fit, mostly just when I want to see what it can do, or how it might do something different. Of course it can be useful in some ways. I still don't understand what the actual use of it is. ChatGPT comes with a disclaimer on the box which alerts you to the fact that it's basically an experiment and by using it, you're part of the experiment.

Should a my lawyer use it when giving me legal advice even though we don't know that it's giving correct information? Should I use it instead of a doctor? Should your doctor use it in your next visit?

I mean there is a chance that even OpenAI were never expecting it to blow up the way it did?

People have become a little too defensive over a product because it talks?

Society has already accepted a light form of this for quite sometime already now. Which is grammar check.