My sense it is cultural. If there's no consequence for breaking stuff then stuff gets broken. Other languages have a stronger culture of shame from breaking stuff.
Thinking we need to shame our colleagues more is a really bad take. You can like your obscure programming language for all sorts of reasons, but if they go around shaming people I'm not surprised people would rather use a friendlier language.
Well, what other way to influence behavior do we have?
If a dependency update breaks my code, it reduces my opinion of that dependency. But if it's the least-worse option, and it's free, I can't do much other than think negative thoughts.
