Google search was incredibly valuable immediately even if most links could have been rubbish. I can't say the same with the current LLMs
It is an incredible achievement that LLMs produce human-like output (e.g., wouldn't know if a gpt bot answers me unless we are discussing a topic where precision/accuracy are important)
but they hallucinate (they are confident BS-generators).
The hype is that LLMs can solve any problem and replace humans (jobs). It is not so.
It may depend on what you do but I find it is easier/faster to do the work myself then to spot and fix [a possibly subtle] error in AI output. Though some of the specific things will improve in time and you can find tasks where AI is useful even today.
I don't see how the models can improve for general tasks (AGI) without being existential threat to humans (not just jobs).