undefined | Better HN

0 pointsDalewyn3y ago0 comments

There is an argument to be made that people of olden times were far, far, far, far more capable at a fundamental level than people of today.

0 comments

edent3y ago

Because they had to be.

I don't need to know how to grow crops, weave a shirt, or wire a plug - those things have been mechanised and automated.

Would someone from 200 years ago trade having to gather firewood for flicking a switch for instant heat? Absolutely!

Would you trade access to Wikipedia for having to travel to a monastery in order to look up a scrap of information? Unlikely!

swatcoder3y ago

Hah. There are absolutely people here on HN right now who would be happy to live in a world of quiet labor and pilgrimages and digital disconnection.

Other lifestyles needn’t be romanticized more than our own, but they also don’t need to be demonized. Keeping yourself safe and fed isn’t a big stress for most people through most of history, yet does get quite hard for some people some times even now. The difference is mostly just textural.

vore3y ago

We are no longer a hunter-gatherer or agrarian society -- people of olden times would fare as well in our society as we would in theirs. Maybe they could be more self-sufficient, but modern society is free from tending to our fields or bison or whatever so we can have more time to do things beyond just subsistence farming during all our waking hours.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse