And no I am not, you are saying that. I think python is way safer than either, you seem to think because you can crash a python program that means the memory vulnerabilities of rust are justified.
It's not just crashes. Python's ctypes API can do anything that unsafe Rust can do, including the parts that permit arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities.
C++ is pervasively memory-unsafe; a bug in any part of a C++ codebase can easily cause undefined behavior, such that you can't isolate the memory-unsafe parts and apply extra assurance techniques to them. Most modern garbage-collected languages do let you do this, as does Rust.
