undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrendall3y ago0 comments

I dunno. I suspect that the news was just as partisan and biased back then, but the public was less able to independently verify news reports.

0 comments

EricE3y ago

Of course the news has always been partisan. They were just honest about it in the past. Look how many newspapers have Democrat or some variation of Republican in their masthead. The real scandal is the recent fiction that journalists are unbiased.

GeekyBear3y ago

There was a time when journalism was seen as an expense in the public interest and not as a partisan entertainment profit center / propaganda outlet.

Stations that did run an editorial with a given partisan viewpoint were even required, by law, to allow an opposing view to be aired in response.

rendallOP3y ago

> Stations that did run an editorial with a given partisan viewpoint were even required, by law, to allow an opposing view to be aired in response.

Sure, but the Overton window was quite slim. Many things were simply never discussed. Homosexuality, interracial romance, adultery of politicians, as just a few examples.

The "alternative perspective" gave the illusion of a full airing of views, but it simply wasn't so.

yamtaddle3y ago

Early SNL (1970s) turned this into a bit on the news segment, with Chevy Chase introducing someone to respond to some (non-existent) editorial of theirs from a past program, to provide alternative viewpoints, as was their journalistic duty (which respondent invariably had mis-heard some word and so was responding, passionately, to entirely the wrong thing—that was the joke)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse