https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FeqF1-Z1g0
it's in german though...
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-...
> In 2013, workers at a German construction company noticed something odd about their Xerox photocopier: when they made a copy of the floor plan of a house, the copy differed from the original in a subtle but significant way. In the original floor plan, each of the house’s three rooms was accompanied by a rectangle specifying its area: the rooms were 14.13, 21.11, and 17.42 square metres, respectively. However, in the photocopy, all three rooms were labelled as being 14.13 square metres in size.
Then ask "was it scanned and archived digitally" and if yes, claim that the document be invalidated on the basis of the scanning station altering the document.
When a normal old codec is used at too low quality levels, it looks like low quality and you do not trust the data.
Maybe the codec needs to include a disclamer watermark that it injects into the output that the image was processed by jbig2 with the aggressive option and all text is not to be trusted.
