undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjustin_oaks3y ago0 comments

I agree. Chesterton's fence doesn't mean that if you don't know why the fence is there, don't ever move it, under any conditions. It means try to find out why it's there before moving it.

In many cases in my career, I've seen code that doesn't make sense or seems like a bad idea. The person who could explain why it's there has long left the company. Am I afraid and leave the screwy stuff there, while citing Chesteron's fence? Hell no. I'll change it to do the right thing. This results in either exposing the reason why it's there, or showing that it really was unnecessary/bad. If something breaks from the change then it's good that I can finally document what wasn't documented before. So either way it's a win.

0 comments

a4isms3y ago

I readily accept that this strategy has worked for you. In my particular case, I work with customers and software where making a change, pushing it to production, and finding out that I missed a key requirement when it breaks is sometimes unacceptably consequential.

But that may not be true for everyone. If making changes and seeing what does or doesn't break is a successful strategy for you, go for it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsjustin_oaks3y ago0 comments

I agree. Chesterton's fence doesn't mean that if you don't know why the fence is there, don't ever move it, under any conditions. It means try to find out why it's there before moving it.

0 comments

a4isms3y ago

But that may not be true for everyone. If making changes and seeing what does or doesn't break is a successful strategy for you, go for it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse