I love how Haskell splits the type definition and function definition into two lines. It’s so readable that way. Also enables outlining your program first with just type definitions, and then going back and filling in the function definitions later.

No, you're not shallow. Rust's syntax has put me off a lot. I was looking to learn an alternate Erlang VM language and liked Gleam, which originally had a Haskell/ML syntax, but they've decided it's a popularity contest, so they chose to go to an Algol, C, Rust looking syntax. Shame. I was learning LFE (Lisp Flavoured Erlang), buecause Lisp, but then Elixir took off because all of the Ruby programmers took to it (and it's got a lot of other stuff going for it, but it's closer to Ruby than LFE!).

I share this opinion. Haskell was my hobby language for 2 years until Rust. I still miss the brevity of Haskell and point-free style in particular.