undefined | Better HN

0 pointsthrowanem3y ago0 comments

No one other than lawyers or lawyer accessories is going to represent the company to the domain owner about it, though.

Source: Ages ago I had a personal domain based on a longstanding nick that happened to partially coincide with the name of a major motion picture studio. That it was a paralegal who called me said they weren't anxious to take it seriously, and all they were really after was just getting me to say it was nothing to do with them so they had me on record in case I later did make it something to do with them. No big deal, but it wasn't like if I had a treatment burning a hole in my pocket I could've parlayed the conversation into a chance to submit it. And even at that, I doubt this will be anything like so simple and nonadversarial.

0 comments

nkozyra3y ago

> No one other than lawyers or lawyer accessories is going to represent the company to the domain owner about it, though.

Of course. Here's the plausible chain of events:

1. Someone at the co. reads about this on HN 2. They tell their boss who might tell their boss, etc. 3. It finally gets to someone who is responsible for telling the lawyers. But they also say "hey this is kind of cool. We'll send a C&D, but maybe reach out to see if there's anything interesting there."

throwanemOP3y ago

I guess it's not implausible somebody would try to open a nonadversarial conversation simultaneously with sending a C&D, but I will say I've never seen it done that way, and I suspect there's a good reason why not.

(Not least because escalating something to counsel, and then having side conversations about it with whoever you just brought to counsel's attention, is a bad idea!)

And that's if they see something here they might want to investigate further, which given SO's stance on ML-generated answers up to this point, I tend somewhat to doubt.

nkozyra3y ago

To be fair, I don't think the two things would happen concurrently.

I have, in fact, seen this exact scenario!

I don't think it's likely, but losing a domain is a small price to pay if that were potentially a goal.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsthrowanem3y ago0 comments

No one other than lawyers or lawyer accessories is going to represent the company to the domain owner about it, though.

0 comments

nkozyra3y ago

> No one other than lawyers or lawyer accessories is going to represent the company to the domain owner about it, though.

Of course. Here's the plausible chain of events:

throwanemOP3y ago

(Not least because escalating something to counsel, and then having side conversations about it with whoever you just brought to counsel's attention, is a bad idea!)

And that's if they see something here they might want to investigate further, which given SO's stance on ML-generated answers up to this point, I tend somewhat to doubt.

nkozyra3y ago

To be fair, I don't think the two things would happen concurrently.

I have, in fact, seen this exact scenario!

I don't think it's likely, but losing a domain is a small price to pay if that were potentially a goal.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse