Let's compare lines of code, because more lines invariably leads to more bugs.
Contents of Beers.svelte:
<script>
export let bottles = 99;
</script>
{#if bottles > 0}
<span class="bottles"
on:click={() => --bottles}>
{bottles} bottles of beer on the wall
</span>
{:else}
<span class="bottles">
No more bottles of beer on the wall
</span>
{/if}
Then to use it:
<script>
import Beers from './Beers.svelte';
</script>
<Beers />
No knowledge of Reactor's existence needed let alone the library's "signal" function. No functions needed at all. No bespoke syntax for the "bottles" CSS class. No vDOM API call. No extra "values" accessing property. It's >90% plain old HTML, CSS, and JS with literally the bare minimum of syntax to handle data binding.
Yes, it requires a compiler, but I would honestly astounded if you even noticed the compiler build time in dev mode. AND the deployed code is smaller. AND it's simpler for the dev to understand and maintain. AND it's likely faster at runtime.
The argument that Svelte adds mental overhead is manifest nonsense. If you like the vDOM, have at it. Follow your bliss. Some folks like hitting and kicking trees. Some folks prefer their coffee too hot to drink.
I for one want a web framework that makes web development as simple, straightforward, and powerful as possible. HTML, CSS, and the smallest amount of JS and HTML annotation imaginable.