I'll just leave this here for now. I'm sure you'll have plenty of reasons to say that 'there was evidence after all' but 'no body no murder' is at least to my reading simply not true.
I stated in plain English that a murder needs a body is not to be taken literally. Obviously evidence is still required. I used an example of witness testimony.
So at this point have you run out of any ammo other than meaningless nitpicks?
