I am very happy to see Davos getting bad rap right now from independent bloggers and independent (small) news outlets. This helps push back against corporate owned media which pushes a positive slant on one world government, "in 20 years you will own nothing and be very happy", etc.
[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/18/mutiny-erup...
It was supposed to sound like a good thing, but it was out of context, so made me think, why even mention it, almost like they have an agenda to sell here.
Yeah no one else does either.
It's not like the WEF is super exclusive, I remember seeing a job offer from a small tech company who got bought for 10M Euro, I read about this company's history and found the founder's Facebook page. He had pictures of a prop plane, I think he spent some of the money learning to fly, and 2-3 pics where he's in Davos, including a blurry selfie of him standing in line for lunch at the WEF in front of Bill Clinton.
Davos is a religious gathering. You wouldn’t be happy/unhappy about other religious gatherings that you don’t participate in.
The elites really don’t have any control or vision over what’s going to happen, just like shamans and religious leaders of the past did not
Is this satire, blindness, or just youthful optimism?
There's a lot of merit to face to face meetings - if you could have a date over FaceTime or in real life, which would you prefer? - and of course it's only the elite/influential people who are invited, they're the ones with the power to change things. Whether or not they're capable of fixing the world or if their hands are somewhat tied because of politics or shareholder motivations, is a different question.
For some populism: I do think most politicians/elites care more about their career/wallet rather than the world.
I've been in a similar situation. Large company outing booked and all set up for the holidays, then there's a sudden layoff involving most of the people booked on the trip. We gave them the tickets and said "why not go anyway?"
If you are in a position you are laying off people which implies you are hurting as a company you should:
- Not spend money on expensive events or non-essential stuff.
- If you've already booked events (like the sting concert) either sell them to another buyer or donate them to charity. The optics of partying while you are firing 10000+ employees is awful.
Instead, it 100% feels "business as usual", one email from Satya and a bunch about extra-curricular events and "cool stuff" happening in the company and campus. I'm really missing the "we're in this together" feeling from startups.
(I am a high-performer working on a profitable and old product and I don't think I'm on the chopping block, I enjoy my work, my team etc.)
When we did a team event it was volunteering together. No fancy restaurants like last year for the same reason - we don't want to be wasteful in an unclear market.
I am disappointed in our execs doing this. I understand it was already probably pre-booked and it was probably just a few hours in a lot of long and frustrating leadership meeting but the optics are bad. Satya is usually such a respected leader for knowing how to do the right thing and avoid these situations, bummer.
A few years ago, I rented a booth space at an event and the company at my side did a massive layoff that included the people in their booth... while the event was running.
( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity_(The_Police_al... )
It was a still fun conference ^^
You’re paid to work while the company believes it is worth paying you.
I’m so tired of seeing these layoff news. DUDE WE ARE IN TECH. I make a ton of money, maybe not as much as some super elite tech workers but enough to live in SF and have six years runway to maintain my lifestyle without a job.
I feel bad for people who make 12/her and get fired without 4 months plus severance, without health insurance extension, etc.
Seriously, stop complaining. End of the day life is not fair and you have to set yourself up to SURVIVE. As a fellow tech worker, realize we are playing a capitalist game and when capital is expensive our jobs are at risk.
It’s work. It’s business. You are exchanging time and skills for money willingly.
But also
"Seriously, stop complaining. End of the day life is not fair and you have to set yourself up to SURVIVE. "
Why would you feel bad for those people if life isn't fair and they should have set themselves to survive?
As someone who got into tech as a self taught engineer at age 25 I am always blown away by the entitled nature of people around me who either A) don't work that hard and goof around on the clock and B) complain when we're literally coddled to the brim with free food, free trips to events every year, and various other free benefits.
I remember not getting a $0.25 per hour raise one year and being upset about it for a minute. I didn't have free top of the line health insurance (no insurance actually), nor did my company just pay for things that have nothing to do with my job. As someone who went from a few hundred bucks in his bank account to now literally six figures in my checking, and much more in stocks and investments (which are down lol), even if I got laid off I know I'm probably getting 5 years x service + 3-4 months full pay severance worst case scenario.
All I'm saying is that we're playing the game (capitalism) and companies will cut their losses. That's just how it works and we choose to sign offer letters, and yes I feel much worse for my friends who are not in tech who can barely afford to put food on the table or meet rent than a fellow tech bro who has to cancel his luxury Lake Tahoe cabin rental during these economic hardship times.
It saddening to see it not questioned enough.
A private gathering—-people with agenda and means..capital media and celebrities—-to normalize and propagate that agenda.
while these globalists say they want more open border they meeting in one of most exclusive country in the world where difficult to get citizenship.
this also a grift. jason calacanis said on all in podcast how they offer him a seat at table for $25k or $40k some number like that in early 2000s.
They're modern day "philosopher kings." This is the world that we live in. In the capitalist meritocracy in which we all live, money is an important point keeping system. So it makes sense that you have to buy a seat at the table and it costs a lot. I imagine that money alone is not enough merit to get a seat though, as there are many other measures of merit or social rank.
I'm not sure how this can be effectively questioned. Ban private gatherings and private property? It's been tried before, didn't go well.