> The $400 headset in question is not doing both.
And? I'm not talking about the $400 headset that was doing both. That was the Quest Pro (which already exists in the market as mixed reality) and eventually the fully AR glasses in R&D assuming you read my comment? Meta already has more than one product for this.
> What might happen in the future is for the discussion about the future. currently not the case.
The over-arching discussion is already about the future Apple AR glasses, and Meta's intention about their own AR glasses couldn't have been more clearer and relevant with their acquisitions.