Actually no. You've underestimated the mindboggling complexity of the human hand working together with our knowledge of the world. Think of the following.

You see an egg. You have a mental model that eggs are fragile and you grasp it delicately.

You see a barbell. It's extremely heavy for its size so you brace yourself and lift appropriately with a strong grip.

You see a bag of chips. You know the bag is going to deform under your hand when you pick it up, but you also cannot squeeze it or you'd crush the chips, so you pick up by pinching and empty corner.

You see a glass jar full of pickles. You know it must be set down gently.

You see a container half full of liquid. You know if you move it fast the internal momentum of the liquid can cause the container to jerk and move unexpectedly. Even if you don't realize it when you start moving it, your mind immediately begins to compensate for this when you feel this occur.

And this is only a tiny set of subconditions that your brain silently optimizes for after you've dropped countless items as a child.

Sure but dozens of other companies can (and do) make cheaper robots optimised for grabbing an item and throwing it in a box. Boston Dynamics specialises in complex generalist robotics and humanoids not automating logistics.