{
"model": "code-davinci-edit-001",
"input": "### Code goes here ###",
"instruction": "Identify and fix all bugs in this Python code."
}
Then the application itself has a nice implementation of client-side diff presentation.That was for the "lint" button - I didn't run this experiment for the "debug" button.
Is that Adrenaline's own model (OpenAI let's you train your own model in their environment, right?), or OpenAI's model?
I would recommend changing it.
I will be super interested when I can run this against a whole git repo codebase instead of a single file.
What I will probably actually do when I get a chance for aidev.codes is use OpenAIs embeddings with a vector search for relevant snippets for the prompt context. Or possibly use the gpt-index project which I think does that for me.
Also, it would be nice if there is a WebStorm plugin.
Also, presumably they will continue to refine beyond what ChatGPT is doing with better models, smarter prompts, etc.
Also, without access to the model (eg. by merely calling OpenAI’s API), no one’s refining it. They need access to the actual model (eg. Bloom)
Using it as a standalone website looks fun too, can't wait to dig into this !
You should also set your site to force HTTPS.
I have a somewhat related service https://aidev.codes but I have to default to using text-davinci-003 instead because the code-davinci-002 rate limit is very small (10-20 requests per minute).
I have been trying to contact their support about it for a month without any response.
xhr.js:162 Refused to set unsafe header "User-Agent"
POST https://api.openai.com/v1/edits 429
Considering that the morality of capitalism is indistinguishable from the morality of a cancer cell, I think I might be on the right side of history here.
I'm also not keen on giving up more of my personal information to use this.