Why is there such a trend lately of companies punishing victims of counterfeiting instead of punishing the counterfeiters?
> While the device lost its primary function as a network switch when the software upgrade was installed, it could
still be accessed via the console. The following message was then displayed on the console during boot:
> [Date Time]: %ILET-1-AUTHENTICATION_FAIL: This Switch may not have been manufactured by Cisco or with
Cisco's authorization. This product may contain software that was copied in violation of Cisco's
license terms. If your use of this product is the cause of a support issue, Cisco may deny operation
of the product, support under your warranty or under a Cisco technical support program such as
Smartnet. Please contact Cisco's Technical Assistance Center for more information.
> Reverting the software version did not fix the problem, likely pointing to evidence of data being overwritten
during the update process.
If you unwittingly buy a fake Louis Vuitton handbag, would it be okay for their goons to break into your house and cut it up? If not, then why is Cisco allowed to do what they did?
