undefined | Better HN

0 pointsClumsyPilot3y ago0 comments

> It'd be perfectly logical to accept road testing FSD, even if it's significantly worse in some areas, as long as this is not exploitable, AND the net gain from allowing it is still overall positive

So are all 20 manufacturers going to get the right to endanger my life just so they can train their self-driving? Or is this spesific to Tesla?

Do I and my family get some compensation for this danger, or in case we are killed? Do we get a share of the profit this self driving car will generate for Tesla ?

What if Tesla never produces a good self deiving car, goes bancrupt, then I died for nothing?

0 comments

epivosism3y ago

It hinges on whether you think it's net safe/unsafe today. if unsafe, I'd support not allowing it, of course. If on net safer, BUT with a different distribution of harm, I think it's quite hard to make a decision. That is what most discussion is about.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsClumsyPilot3y ago0 comments

> It'd be perfectly logical to accept road testing FSD, even if it's significantly worse in some areas, as long as this is not exploitable, AND the net gain from allowing it is still overall positive

So are all 20 manufacturers going to get the right to endanger my life just so they can train their self-driving? Or is this spesific to Tesla?

Do I and my family get some compensation for this danger, or in case we are killed? Do we get a share of the profit this self driving car will generate for Tesla ?

What if Tesla never produces a good self deiving car, goes bancrupt, then I died for nothing?

0 comments

epivosism3y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse