undefined | Better HN

0 pointscarapace3y ago0 comments

If I promise never to call him "Doctor" again will you look through the referenced papers with me?

I just woke up, I've got my coffee, and I'm ready to go...

- - - -

Gatekeeping the term "Doctor" is uninteresting, and it doesn't make your side of the argument look good. You have nothing stronger to dun him on?

If you really want to focus on character assassination rather than truth and science, well here you go: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-01-29-mn-26470-... Have fun.

I'll be busy reading papers. You know where to find me if you change your mind.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

icepat3y ago· 2 in thread

> Gatekeeping the term "Doctor" is uninteresting, and it doesn't make your side of the argument look good. You have nothing stronger to dun him on?

I think the fact that he's claiming to have credentials that he does not is pretty damning. You have this utterly backwards. If I claim to have founded something groundbreaking, and it turns out I lied about my credentials, that casts doubt on everything I've done.

carapaceOP3y ago

So he calls himself "Dr." but he doesn't have a PhD. I get it. So terrible. Much deceptive. Wow.

Do you want to discuss some scientific studies or not?

icepat3y ago

Not if you're going to sarcastically dismiss valid points that discredit what you're talking about like this.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse