Nah I meant kranke155's claim that AskHistorians says Hardcore History is inaccurate.
That's not true.
However, I would agree that Hardcore History leans more towards the entertainment side, so while the overall picture is inline with what historians say (Cyrus the Great as a leader vs Darius or the effects of the Gracchi brothers), the specific stories that Dan Carlin says may have other interpretations or other versions.
Obviously, it would interrupt the flow to say "Oh but XYZ disagrees and says this specific story actually happened 5 years earlier", so Dan prefaces it by saying that it's one interpretation.
Saying that "AskHistorians thinks Hardcore History is really innacurate" is completely false.