[Edit] It's since made sense... but single-clicking on the menu at the top of the screen briefly shows something, but it doesn't stay open, so I didn't think it was associated with the dialog.
It's a horrible UI in terms of discoverability.
they change what a mouse click elsewhere does
this is very bad for usability
larry tesler was the chief scientist of apple about that time and guess what his license plate says
I am not sure why they didn’t do what Windows later did, and allow users to open the menu with a click, and select an item with a second click, but it might be as simple as that the thought hadn’t crossed their mind.
The logic behind that initial design was that menus were really just "buttons with options" and a mouseup should initiate an action. The menus had few items so there wasn't much dragging involved.
As software evolved, menus grew and spending an entire click on "present me with your selection of options" just became sensible.
this is from 01987
its discoverability was pretty decent compared to the other user interfaces that were popular in 01987, like ms-dos, lotus 1-2-3, the bourne shell (no tab completion), the bsd c shell (control-d for filename completion), emacs, vi, commodore 64 basic, vax vms dcl, etc.