These tech "influencers" and "big CEOs" know no shame in their constant attention seeking. I guess to be fair, many people on HN or other platforms talk about AGI and other popular things, but the statements and arguments generally are a lot more specific or nuanced, relative to these quackery beliefs from "influencers" who are clearly attempting to gather a digital "I am smart" badge. Just lol.
I'm impressed with how they've kludged crypto hype into the AI-hype discussion actually. It's going to provide "civilizational equilibrium" no less, because AGI is apparently just buying compute time, which obviously can't be done with money.
I am interested in understanding why more training flops vs say more parameters. Surely bigger models perform better but perhaps there is a limit?
I don't quite understand how distributed subtrees will work.
"[...] interesting to me how many of the ChatGPT takes are either "this is AGI" (obviously not close, lol) [...]"
Carmack is doing an AGI startup; maybe he can offer a definition of what it is exactly his company will attempt to deliver and how we can recognise it when/if it does?