I dunno, with all of the recent leaks, Twitters internal workings have all been made public. Sounds pretty transparent to me!

well this is rather the perfect test case - is Elon willing to allow the freedom of speech for someone who is doing something that is pretty trivial but to him personally annoying at a pretty low level?

The answer seems to be "No, Elon only wants the speech that he likes"

This does not bode well for twitter's future, or for that matter SpaceX/Tesla if Elon is going to be spending all his time as Twitter's chief censor

Unfounded hope of course: no one who has, or had, monetary interest in the success of Twitter would or would have gained from transparency.

Twitter is a public company, and may be a digital public square, but it does not have the public good as a rewardable goal.

Agreed, I wanted to believe but this is disappointing.

Even worse, there's no transparency here: What rule was violated, how long is the suspension, etc.