undefined | Better HN

0 pointsajross3y ago0 comments

That seems to be assuming facts not in evidence, though. Did Hertz decisionmakers continue operating the system after having been notified it was giving false positives? I tend to agree that sounds like criminal negligence. But nothing seems to be alleging that anywhere.

Flipping it around: would you feel comfortable calling the police to report that criminal negligence? Or would you be worried about getting in trouble for a false report?

The system is tilted towards non-prosecution, and for some very good reasons. No one's going to jail here.

0 comments

phpisthebest3y ago

If I was a victim absolutely I would be pursuing that with local prosecutors

>The system is tilted towards non-prosecution, and for some very good reasons. No one's going to jail here.

yes for high profile corporate execs it is, if some Teenager reported his car stolen but then found out a friend borrowed it, not only would the teen reporting the crime go to jail, but the teen that borrowed it likely would still be prosecuted for theft at the same time

Kinda like "resisting arrest" charge that is still valid even when there is no underlying crime to resist arrest from....

Your idea of " system is tilted towards non-prosecution" only exisit for one socio-economic class of citizens

pessimizer3y ago

It doesn't pass any smell test for filing false police reports hundreds of times to be a series of hundreds of mistakes.

ajrossOP3y ago

You're saying that Hertz deliberately targetted these people for some reason? No, that's ridiculous. Clearly this was a mistake. No one thinks Hertz was deliberately trying to punish its own customers. They just messed up and rolled out a feature with a buggy fraud detector.

phpisthebest3y ago

you are too caught up on if Hertz did it deliberately, that is not the test. Reasonableness, / Reasonable person is the test.

1. Would a Reasonable person believe the system would lead to false reports

2. Were there any engineers or people internal to the company raising concerns that were ignored by managers / executives (I believe there likely was and there is more than enough probable cause for police to get a search warrant to find out)

3. After the first reports came in what actions were taken by the company

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsajross3y ago0 comments

Flipping it around: would you feel comfortable calling the police to report that criminal negligence? Or would you be worried about getting in trouble for a false report?

The system is tilted towards non-prosecution, and for some very good reasons. No one's going to jail here.

0 comments

phpisthebest3y ago

If I was a victim absolutely I would be pursuing that with local prosecutors

>The system is tilted towards non-prosecution, and for some very good reasons. No one's going to jail here.

Kinda like "resisting arrest" charge that is still valid even when there is no underlying crime to resist arrest from....

Your idea of " system is tilted towards non-prosecution" only exisit for one socio-economic class of citizens

pessimizer3y ago

It doesn't pass any smell test for filing false police reports hundreds of times to be a series of hundreds of mistakes.

ajrossOP3y ago

phpisthebest3y ago

you are too caught up on if Hertz did it deliberately, that is not the test. Reasonableness, / Reasonable person is the test.

1. Would a Reasonable person believe the system would lead to false reports

3. After the first reports came in what actions were taken by the company

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse