undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjustsomehnguy3y ago0 comments

> change in the ecological system - more poachers than before - by changing the elephants to no longer having tusks

Change in the body - more torn hymen than before - by changing the humans to no longer having hymen.

Right?

0 comments

Chris20483y ago

Not sure why you think this example is better - a torn hymen isn't as fatal to humans as a poacher is to elephants.

Because if 'evolution reacts' (q) then it would react by removing hymen. Also because women without torn hymen don't pass genes.

Did evolution reacted by removing tusks?

PS if you start to tell me how a hymen could be untorn even in the case of a complete vaginal intercourse I would slap you over TCP/IP.

Chris20483y ago

Why would it? Women without torn hymen don't pass genes because they didn't have sex, not because they possessed a hymen. As soon as they have sex, the hymen tears - so it poses no barrier to passing on genes.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsjustsomehnguy3y ago0 comments

> change in the ecological system - more poachers than before - by changing the elephants to no longer having tusks

Change in the body - more torn hymen than before - by changing the humans to no longer having hymen.

Right?

0 comments

Chris20483y ago

Not sure why you think this example is better - a torn hymen isn't as fatal to humans as a poacher is to elephants.

justsomehnguyOP3y ago

Because if 'evolution reacts' (q) then it would react by removing hymen. Also because women without torn hymen don't pass genes.

Did evolution reacted by removing tusks?

PS if you start to tell me how a hymen could be untorn even in the case of a complete vaginal intercourse I would slap you over TCP/IP.

Chris20483y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse