undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnextlevelwizard3y ago0 comments

The primary part is that article is pure sensationalism and clickbait. There was zero lines of none pseudo code. Sure it was syntactically correct python, but that is long way from actually working.

Same with Stable Diffusion. People acted as if it alone is going to kill artists and make every people able to make convincing fake news as snap of their fingers, but that is not the case. Stable Diffusion is very impressive, but it still requires work after the image has been generated to be anything but a toy.

Maybe in couple years it could evolve, but we are still quite far.

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

zdenham3y ago

Fair point on sensationalism, I think it's a useful hook to get folks reading and talking.

There is a "Nuance" section at the bottom where I qualify most of the rah rah language.

That being said, I disagree that it is that far from actually working. Check out the codex demo here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGUCcjHTmGY&ab_channel=OpenA... This is a year old and we've made a lot of progress since then.

The model is certainly capable of writing non pseudo-code, although I started hitting rate limits before I got it all the way there in my example.

Edit (typos)

naasking3y ago

> The primary part is that article is pure sensationalism and clickbait. There was zero lines of none pseudo code. Sure it was syntactically correct python, but that is long way from actually working.

Not as far as you think. This has repeatedly been the case for AI progress so far.

> Same with Stable Diffusion. People acted as if it alone is going to kill artists and make every people able to make convincing fake news as snap of their fingers, but that is not the case.

I'm not sure how you can make that determination at this time as it literally just came out.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse