undefined | Better HN

0 pointsandyjohnson03y ago0 comments

I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. I am disputing that this marks the "death" of the magazine.

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

dekken_3y ago· 2 in thread

Purely speaking for myself, but I could tell it was metaphorical. Given the "magazine" is still operating, and that I read some of the article.

nobodyandproud3y ago

A plain reading of the first four or five paragraphs doesn’t tell me that this is a calculation.

dekken_3y ago

I meant that the magazine is not literally dead, but in the sense of "dead to me".

oh_my_goodness3y ago

Not death of magazine. Correct.

But is the distinction between calculation and experiment really specialist knowledge?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse