He is obviously not referring to professional mixed martial artists (UFC, Strikeforce, Pride, etc) when using the term "school-trained martial artist." I assume he means someone who visits a gym on a casual basis, but holds down a regular full time job. To try to even qualify such an argument without getting into any kind of specifics (weights of parties involved, one-on-one fight, legal ramifications) is ridiculous. If he is referring to professional mma artists he is off his rocker. These guys would annihilate "street fighters" and do so on a regular basis. These is a NSFW story about a mediocre pro fighter named "War Machine" (yes I know) and a street fight where he laid out something like 9 guys.
I would give the the book the time of day but I will never give money to anyone who is a self proclaimed "victor in over 200 street fights" because I myself have won over 400.
I started out taking those, and even got a black belt, but in the end I knew nothing other than how to do some kata and dance around a ring with my opponent trading "blows". The only thing of value I learned there was balance, and even that training was mediocre.
So his analogy of "school trained martial artist" is very apt. I know a whole bunch of guys like this who would get their ass handed to them in a real fight with anyone of even minor real-world fighting experience.
On the other hand, a school trained street fighter would have an advantage over an untrained street fighter, all other things being equal.
Of course anyone trained for professional fighting (UFC et al) receives training with substance (techniques that are useful in the real world, and LOTS of actual combat). I'm not sure if there's a CS equivalent to this.
I'm so sick of how programmers are supposedly "rock stars", "ninjas", "martial artists" or whatever the fuck else.
You don't see astrophysicists comparing themselves (in large numbers) to ninjas. Because they are Goddamn Astrophysicists, and that's cool enough already.
As a profession let's grow the fuck up and just own being programmers.
His article is well reasoned and actually full of content. I suggest you read it because it is actually well worth the read.
