We have the same problem in the EU. Pickups are not as popular here, but even small cars are getting SUV styling with pedestrian-killing hoods.
I had high hopes that Tesla would make sleek and pedestrian-safer cars popular again: the Model X has a pretty low front for an SUV. Unfortunately Tesla threw all that out the window and designed the most effective pedestrian-crushing-device I've ever seen -- I hope the Cybertruck is delayed for a few more years....
It seems like a classic collective action problem. If an automaker has a new car design which will make its passengers 5% safer in a crash but passengers in the other car 10% more likely to die then they have incentive to do the design change anyways. I wouldnt know the exact numbers but would think with a lot of the changes (such as cars getting 1000s of lbs heavier) the impacts are real - especially when you factor in pedestrians.
I spent a lot of time in a 2012 Defender without any airbags and seats which were essentially just screwed to a wooden/sheet metal frame - but the high and upright seating position made me feel safer than do in an (objectively safer) sedan or hatchback.
At least 25% of the vehicles on the roads there wouldn't be considered legally road worthy in western Europe
This suggests to me that there probably isn't a desperate need for stricter vehicle inspections in the US.
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/... (PDF)
I'm pretty sure you're mistaken. In many urban counties, there's an every other year emissions inspection (Smog Check), but that's not looking for safety issues. And for most post-2000 cars, it's a quick visual inspection under the hood, read the ODB-II emissions readiness status, and pump the throttle and look for smoke (might be diesel only), older cars that are 1975 or newer get a probe in the tailpipe at idle and 15?mph on a dyno, even older cars don't get checked.
American drivers take awful care of their cars. bald tyres, ripped off bumpers, worn brakes, ... It's shocking coming back from (western) europe from vacation this summer, how trash the cars are on the road here. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
Then how does that explain why increased road deaths are exceptional to the USA?
In Europe we mostly use van derived chassis for commercial vehicles. Ford Transits or Fiat Ducato (Dodge Ram Promaster in NA). They seem to be able to serve the same purpose without having terrifying blind spots.
It's amazing how they fold at the slightest hit.
The rest is true but a bit complicated. The US Federal government subsidizes arterials which gives local governments an incentive to build more arterials so they can receive more federal funding.
My belief is that very bad habits were created by the empty roads in 2020 that made people start speeding. A plausible case can be constructed around this theory based on evidence. A lot of people are anecdotally familiar with this as well.
Traffic data indicates the higher death toll was related to higher average
speeds in conjunction with more of those on the roads driving under the
influence of drugs and alcohol and a slight decline in seatbelt use.[1]
Speeding increased after the pandemic lockdown.[2] There also appears to be an increase in road rage incidents.[3] So far in 2022 NHTSA says that there is an increase in road deaths for early 2022.[4] One theory that could explain the sustained increase is lower levels of traffic enforcement.[1]: https://apnews.com/article/covid-19-speeding-highway-deaths-...
[2]: https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/pandemic-lockdowns-made-rus...
[3]: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/road-rage-has-risen-d...
[4]: https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/early-estimates-first-q...
The taller nose of an SUV better distributes forces across more of a pedestrian’s body, which reduces injury. And you get pushed ahead of the car instead of being scooped up to hit the windshield with your head. This is again better for the pedestrian as long as the car stops in time not to run over the person lying on the ground.
You’ll notice that non-SUV noses have been getting taller and flatter for the past ~15 years. This is a direct result of Euro NCAP rules for pedestrian safety.
edit: if you’re downvoting, I really suggest you watch the linked video. It’s great food for thought.
Mind you the taller car was only about elbow height, not like some lifted trucks you see these days where the bumper roughly aligns with a person’s hips.
> In the Michigan crashes, SUVs caused more serious injuries than cars when impacts occurred at greater than 19 miles per hour. At speeds of 20-39 mph, 3 out of 10 crashes with SUVs (30 percent) resulted in a pedestrian fatality, compared with 5 out of 22 for cars (23 percent). At 40 mph and higher, all three crashes with SUVs killed the pedestrian (100 percent), compared with 7 out of 13 crashes involving cars (54 percent). Below 20 miles per hour there was little difference between the outcomes, with pedestrians struck by either vehicle type tending to sustain minor injuries.
Euro NCAP rules for pedestrian safety: https://www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-expla...
Notice even in the thumbnails on that page, the car has a much taller flatter nose than a comparable car would’ve in the early 2000’s.
It does look like modern SUVs are less safe than the SUVs of old, however. I guess they’re getting too big. If you look at the SUV that Fifth Gear was testing with in the early 2000’s, it basically counts as a “small compact” in modern USA. https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/new-study-suggests-todays-s...
As someone else mentioned, the biggest problem may be turning visibility. This combined with right-turn-on-red creates a uniquely American safety issue.
To my mind 4x4 still very much calls to mind vehicles that are 4WD for a functional reason.
Americans have gone a bit nuts with the SUV label - we don't call things like a Model Y an SUV, it's just a hatchback. Some other models Americans call SUVs are Estates or People Carriers. We probably wouldn't call things like a Porsche Cayenne a 4x4 because it's never going off road. That will happily be called an SUV with all the selfish egotism implied. Other names for it would be more deliberately insulting e.g. Chelsea Tractor etc.
As someone who also would not like to meet his demise by an errant vehicle, I think I would rather see a bunch of safety tech designed to not hit pedestrians in the first place would be ideal. Auto stop seems to be getting pretty good and while you could never eliminate vehicle to pedestrian crashes(suicide by car is likely impossible to protect against in many scenarios) But I hope we can stop making all the cars look like a shin destroying tear drop. :)
Crashes are unavoidable, and any feature that can reduce the lethality of crashes should be considered.
One factor I notice is most drivers have their phone up in front of their faces. And at least during rush hour, the biggest trucks are driving pretty slow and the smaller more random drivers definitely correlate to smart phone obsessed drivers. Lots of sudden moves.
Further, people on the freeway totally obsessed with their phones are easy to spot: lane drifting and driving speeds that are typically inconsistent with the prevailing speed of the cars around them.
I drive a Tesla and use auto pilot almost all the time (I don’t have FSD). When you’re going a very consistent speed, the inconsistent behavior of the cars around you feels way more prevalent.
Another potential factor: left lane highway driving. I drove in a 3rd world country this summer and they were very consistent about driving in the right lane and only passing in the left lane. No one at all drove in the left lane. I think left lane driving in the US leads to more risky maneuvers and road rage responses.
When I drove in Germany it was eye opening to no longer be the exception as a person actually following the rules and not driving like someone on amphetamines in a rush for a meeting. It’s the same feeling when you work at a company with bad management and then work at one with good management: “You mean I can just trust you to do your job…?” -> “You mean I can trust you to drive a car at high speeds without killing me…?”
Only have had adaptive cruise control the past few months.
I had regular cruise control for ages. I mostly stopped using it. On roads with any amount of traffic, I found it encouraged driving in a way that prioritized maintaining speed no matter what including getting close or changing lanes when it really wasn't necessary. And if I just constantly overrode it, why bother using it?
And I think if more people took this approach en masse we’d actually see a lot of dangerous behavior disappear.
Drift, JERK, drift, JERK. It's the mating dance of people who can't stop twittering, facebooking, or texting for even a second.
I've noticed this as well (but I'm not in US).
1. https://www.gov.uk/using-mobile-phones-when-driving-the-law
But totally with you on phones. I've always made a habit of making eye contact with people so I know I've been seen (on bike & on foot). It's very difficult to do now - everyone's staring at their knees.
(Not in the US, and yes it's illegal here.)
I try to stay in the right lane at all times, but according to truckers it's safer to stay in the left lane, as vehicles merging onto a highway from the right act poorly.
https://www.denver7.com/news/national/cities-and-states-bann...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/15/us/police-traffic-stops.h...
Over time, things add up.
A really curious person will ask if the drop in enforcement correlates with rise in deaths. They seem to start at the same time.
Then you have people pulling out into traffic, turning left from the right lane, stopping for no reason in the middle of the road...
Combine that with 1 in 8 drivers not even having car insurance (it's over 20% in some states), the amount of irresponsibility is mind-boggling.
Or are you suggesting that collisions at higher speeds, or from running red lights won't increase the chances of injuries for both pedestrians or occupants in cars?
The OP added the other article after posting and realizing the weakness of the argument with just the first source, so I'm not addressing it.
P(causing death | minor violation ) > P(causing death | ~ minor violation)
Also:
P(reckless driving | without cops) > P(reckless driving | cops)
Here let me one step further and present data:
> California to Stop Towing, Impounding Vehicles of Unlicensed Drivers
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/california-impounding-...
"According to a study conducted by the California Department of Motor Vehicles, unlicensed drivers are almost three times more likely to cause a fatal crash than licensed drivers."
https://www.berginjurylawyers.com/blog/auto-accident/unlicen...
Is NYTimes so journalistically lazy/corrupt that they couldn't connect two obvious pieces of facts?
I think the opinion NYT is programming into their readers is that normal people owning the means of private transportation is bad. The particular facts or coherence of the argument is immaterial.
Just believe the opposite of whatever Pravda says and you’ll be a’ight.
* In April 2014 San Francisco police issued 11,612 tickets for traffic violations. In April 2022 they issued 338. No, that's not a typo. It went from 11,612 to 338. (Some links here: https://twitter.com/hknightsf/status/1537100042623848448)
* NYC police issued 5,039 tickets during the third week of July 2022; they issued 19,126 during the same period in 2019. Unlike San Francisco, they haven't totally stopped writing tickets, but the numbers are down drastically. (Some info: https://nypost.com/2020/08/09/nypd-traffic-tickets-plummet-b...)
* In Minneapolis police have been making 80% fewer traffic stops each week since the death of George Floyd. (Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-minneapolis-police-s...)
Similar to what happened with lead tetraethyl in the 50s-70s.
What are possible long-term neurological complications of COVID-19? https://www.ninds.nih.gov/current-research/coronavirus-and-n...
Does nerve damage contribute to long COVID symptoms? https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/03/does-nerve-da...
First three DDG hits for “long Covid nerve damage.” IOW OP’s speculation is plausible.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/deaths-of-despair-depres...
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._j...
[2]" https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2022-07-19/...
If we're guessing about correlations I'd point to something else that happened in 2014 that's much more significant and directly related: the death of Mike Brown in Ferguson, after which police who were roundly criticized for pulling over too many people committed to performing drastically fewer traffic stops. The second visible spike follows the death of George Floyd, which resulted in a redoubling of that commitment [0].
[0] See my other comment in this thread for some numbers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33769708
The fact of the matter is that American roads twice as safe as European roads on a per-mile basis--which is the only meaningful way to measure road safety.
So... why write an article about how unsafe American roads are relative to European roads when they are twice as safe?
The solution of driving less doesn't seem useful or astute. It also doesn't explain why deaths went up as people drove less often during the pandemic.
There is a quote that seems to ring true to me: "There's two types of riders; those who have crashed, and those who will." Most new riders don't believe it, but the truth is that whether you crash or not is almost never in your control, and being naive of this will just get you killed faster. Unfortunately, death seems to be something that is ever present if you are part of a bigger rider community, a lot of riders know someone close that passed away.
The timeline for CAFE standards making America's most popular vehicles enormous tracks with the uptick on their graph. Though maybe it's something else. Someone down-thread suggested "meth" but vehicle size seems an awful lot more likely, especially since its motorcyclists and pedestrians that are dying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_average_fuel_economy
the lack of small trucks could also be caused by dark marketing of larger, heavier vehicles as "more secure".
https://www.reddit.com/r/fuckcars
Until I stumbled across this it had not occurred to me how much people (and walking) are placed second to cars and infrastructure. Surely this needs to change going forward.
I half get the impression the US would be a happier place if you'd give up the charade and just let the cars vote instead.
Crossing the street should be safer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ByEBjf9ktY
How to quickly build a cycling city: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI-1YNAmWlk
Wasting money on car infrastructure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds-v2-qyCc8
The wrong way to set speed limits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bglWCuCMSWc
Safe cycling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8F5hXqS-Ac
"Stroads" are dangerous: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzNZUeUHAM
How does this correct for average mileage spent in cars per per country? Seems like mostly a function of population density and wealth?
ie maybe the US has low pop density and high wealth, so unlike the highlighted Japan/France (who have great public transit / rail), we can't justify it as much but people can still afford to use cars constantly.
Judging based on traffic aggression, it would seem America is actually on the more chill side compared to what I've driven in across the world.
I think their recommendations to change urban spaces to make them safer make sense though, so no argument there. More just wondering if maybe our car culture is kind of baked-in to our material conditions.