I would say fart noises are the comedy equivalent of fart noises, but in any case, I sure do love people getting upset by the comedy equivalent of fart noises. Speaking of which, I would actually pay Musk $8 if it meant he would post a video of himself doing the old underarm fart noise thing and I could see all the fantastic "well I never" reactions from everybody who got upset by it.

>It was one thing when he was just a user of Twitter, but now he’s in charge, and it seems like a tone is being set that’s not really the vibe I’m into.

What's wrong with the new owner of Twitter using Twitter in exactly the same way that a lot of other Twitter users use it for, memes and jokes?

I find that rather refreshing, actually. It's a variant of eating one's own dogfood.

Were you happy with all the decisions twitter was making up until elon musk took over?

His process tree has only produced private and reusable rockets, space internet, electric vehicles, and hundreds of billions in value. But he makes crude jokes like 90% of the men on the whole planet. Clearly there's something deeply wrong.

Is it strange and inappropriate if most people think it is a funny joke and laugh it off? Who goes out of their way to look at Elon posts just to be offended?

It is funny. I think it's hilarious and the fact he shared it in public makes it even more so. It's one of his most liked tweets, so a lot of other people also thought it was funny. Comedy is subjective, but if a lot of people think something is funny then it is objectively funny. And it is perfectly appropriate for public figures to reveal something of themselves and have some fun in public. Puritans will always be offended by this kind of sex joke, or by the gays being allowed to marry or whatever, but we laugh at them too, they make it even funnier.

In my opinion what would be inappropriate for a billionaire CEO, and reveal deep flaws in decision making process, and the decision making process of any government official or governing body who subsequently partners with that CEO, is to fraternize with the likes of Epstein after he was convicted, e.g., https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-.... But I guess morality is also subjective so people might disagree with me there too.

He can get away with posting just about any silly thought because he has no board of directors to answer to and no one can fire him. Big difference when you are thinking of him as a CEO.