Of course, that’s an absurd interpretation.
So it's totally true that no one is actually mislead by this, but I absolutely understand those who try to pretend they are, and have a slight disdain for those who try to defend this bullshit.
There's maybe an argument to be made that using language which implies the legitimacy of organizations as presenting "all of us" is a sort of supremacist way to act, because it casually legitimizes whoever happens to be in power without questioning where they got that power or whether they earned or deserve it.
But, like, it's a standards body. If the world didn't have one it would want to go and make one and then be back where we started. This isn't the interesting battlefield for that kind of point.