undefined | Better HN

0 pointsLocke168914y ago0 comments

You seem to be spending a lot of time making specific excuses to why you don't need to listen to an opposing argument. Perhaps you should realize that your inability to listen to logical arguments is a sign of a problem.

0 comments

jdp2314y ago

Or, perhaps you should realize that the "logical" arguments are not actually logical and have been repeatedly refuted.

prodigal_erik14y ago

If you're trying to win over rational people, and refutations are out there to be had, they need to be included. Anyone who thinks "everyone says this argument has the same glaring flaws, and that illustrates how awesome the argument is!" is at risk of reaching conspiracy-theory levels of crazy.

jdp2314y ago

The author explained why the people making the traditional arguments do in fact illustrate how accurate his observation is. It's true though that articles won't reach guys are so defensive or clueless on this subject that they're not responding rationally.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsLocke168914y ago0 comments

0 comments

jdp2314y ago

Or, perhaps you should realize that the "logical" arguments are not actually logical and have been repeatedly refuted.

prodigal_erik14y ago

jdp2314y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse