> And there is no "conspiracy", the author conspired with... who?
> However, it is a trap to engage with the disingenuous.
I agree that there was clearly no conspiracy. However, the implication that was made is that the left is disingenuously conspiring in the support of this article / attitude.
> It seems fairly safe to presume it was posted in anticipation of being upset with the results
Doesn't seem like a safe presumption to me. This is a congressional election and congress is not very popular with either partisan electorate. The simplest explanation is that this is a journalist capitalizing on popular sentiment and a hot topic with an article.